|
Rating: (out of 4)
Is the reporting balanced; that is, does it give both sides of the issue? The article does not dispute the effectiveness of the treatment. (0)
Does the report sensationalize the material? Sort of; for example, it uses an anecdote that terms a child's change in behaviour as "historic." (0.5)
Does the information come from a scientific journal? No, this is almost an advertisement for a private clinic. (0)
Does it fit with existing evidence about autism? No. There is no credible evidence that the Tomatis method works in children with autism. (0)
Rating: 0.5/4
|